HAVE A SCOOP? Showcase it by submitting the link here

The Headpiece for the Staff of Ra: Logical fallacies in real life: affirming the consequent

1
Hotify
Read this article hotklixed More than a Year Ago! The argument is fallacious because P need not be necessary for Q to come about. Here's a real life illustration. P would be something like 'the Left supports the Enemy' while Q might be 'the Left is critical of the war' or 'the Enemy wins the war'. The Headpiece for the Staff of Ra: Logical fallacies in real life: affirming the consequent
By aldrose indur  |  More than a Year Ago
Source: staffofra.blogspot.com
Comments ()    |    Add to Favourite    |    Report Abuse
Advertisement
Comments ()
Please login to post comment
Popular Links
More Links by aldrose indur
1
Hotify
1
Hotify
Kata-kata Profesor Ungku Aziz « Permata Kata
1
Hotify
1
Hotify
1
Hotify
Share on Hotklix from any website. Drag the above button to your browser's bookmark toolbar. Unable to add the button?
Featured Video
Advertisement
Hotklix/Social
Find us on Google+